Risk & Volatility
Interest Rate Risk Across A Bond Ladder
Buying bonds maturing in successive years does not remove rate risk, but it changes the form that risk takes and when the holder is exposed to it.

A ladder holds bonds maturing in consecutive periods, reinvesting each maturity at the far end. The structure is often described as protecting against rate movements, which requires qualification.
How the structure operates
Equal amounts are invested in bonds maturing in successive years, so a portion of the portfolio returns as cash on a regular schedule.
Each maturing bond is reinvested at the longest rung, which keeps the ladder's shape while gradually refreshing the yields it holds.
The average maturity stays roughly constant, and the portfolio's yield migrates toward prevailing rates over a period equal to the ladder's length.
What it does and does not protect against
Holding each bond to maturity means price movements along the way do not determine what is received, since the bond repays its face amount.
The price risk has not disappeared. It has been converted into reinvestment exposure, since the money returning each year is redeployed at unknown rates.
The structure therefore averages the experience of rate changes rather than avoiding it, which is a meaningful benefit but a different one from protection.
Why holding to maturity is the key condition
The argument depends entirely on not selling early. A holder forced to liquidate mid-ladder faces market prices like any other bond seller.
This makes the ladder appropriate where the timing of spending is known and matches the maturity schedule, and less appropriate where needs are uncertain.
Bond funds hold portfolios that are continuously rolled rather than held to maturity, which is why their behavior differs from an individual ladder.
Credit and call complications
The face amount is received only if the issuer pays, so a ladder built from corporate or municipal issues carries credit exposure at each rung.
Callable bonds undermine the structure, since a call collapses a distant rung into immediate cash at the least convenient time.
Diversifying issuers across rungs addresses the first problem, and reading call schedules addresses the second.
The practical costs of building one
Individual bond purchases in retail size can carry meaningful dealer markups, particularly in fragmented markets, which reduces the yield actually obtained.
Defined-maturity funds exist that hold portfolios terminating in a stated year, offering a similar profile with different costs and characteristics.
Which approach fits depends on the size of the portfolio, the spending schedule and individual circumstances, and a qualified professional is the appropriate source.
Also by Nour Haddad
- Comparing two funds properlyFunds & ETFs
- What happens if a fund or platform failsFunds & ETFs
- Thematic and sector fundsFunds & ETFs
- Factor investing, explained honestlyFunds & ETFs





